Let the numbers do the talking.
Sherman Oaks, CA vs Stockton, CA
| Category | Sherman Oaks, CA | Stockton, CA |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | ||
| Verdict | Good for now | Think twice |
| Median Price | $1.32M | $358K ✓ Lower price |
| Median Rent | $2K | $830 ✓ Lower rent |
| Median Income | $108K ✓ Higher income | $20K |
| Price Volatility | Moderate ✓ More stable | High |
| Getting Around | ||
| Walk Score | 35/100 ✓ More walkable | 29/100 |
| Transit Score | 32/100 ✓ Better transit | 2/100 |
| Bike Score | N/A | 1/100 ✓ More bikeable |
| Commute | 24 min ✓ Shorter commute | 57 min |
| Safety & Environment | ||
| Safety Grade | D+ ✓ Safer | F |
| Violent Crime | Moderate ✓ Lower risk | High |
| Property Crime | Moderate ✓ Lower risk | High |
| Flood Risk | Low | Low |
| Air Quality | Moderate | Moderate |
| Community | ||
| Schools | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Best for | Families with kidsProfessionals commuting to downtown LAAffluent individuals looking for a suburban feel | RentersLow incomeUrban professionals |
Bottom line
For families with kids or professionals looking for a more affluent suburban lifestyle, Sherman Oaks is a better option, despite its high housing costs and car dependence. However, for low-income renters or individuals seeking very affordable options, Stockton might be the only choice, despite its serious safety concerns and limited public transit. Ultimately, Sherman Oaks offers a more desirable quality of life for the right price, while Stockton is a last resort due to its numerous drawbacks.
Share this comparison