Let the numbers do the talking.
O'Fallon, MO vs St. Charles, MO
| Category | O'Fallon, MO | St. Charles, MO |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | ||
| Verdict | Think twice | Think twice |
| Median Price | $263K | $232K ✓ Lower price |
| Median Rent | $1K | $1K ✓ Lower rent |
| Median Income | $92K ✓ Higher income | $80K |
| Price Volatility | Moderate | Moderate |
| Getting Around | ||
| Walk Score | Car-dependent | 2/100 ✓ More walkable |
| Transit Score | Minimal transit | Minimal transit |
| Bike Score | N/A | N/A |
| Commute | 56 min | 39 min ✓ Shorter commute |
| Safety & Environment | ||
| Safety Grade | D+ | D+ |
| Violent Crime | Moderate | Moderate |
| Property Crime | Moderate | Moderate |
| Flood Risk | Low | Low |
| Air Quality | Moderate | Moderate |
| Community | ||
| Schools | N/A | N/A |
| Best for | Middle‑income familiesSuburban commutersThose who prefer a quiet lifestyle | Commuters to St. LouisPeople who prefer a quieter suburban environmentFamilies looking for affordable housing |
Bottom line
Both O'Fallon and St. Charles pose similar concerns with lack of walkability, poor schools, and mixed safety. However, if you prioritize a shorter commute to St. Louis over other aspects, St. Charles is slightly more convenient at 39 minutes compared to O'Fallon's 56 minutes. Ultimately, neither area is ideal, but St. Charles is the slightly better choice if commute time is your top consideration.
Share this comparison