Let the numbers do the talking.
Los Angeles, CA vs Santa Rosa, CA
| Category | Los Angeles, CA | Santa Rosa, CA |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | ||
| Verdict | Good for now | Good for now |
| Median Price | $1.14M | $606K ✓ Lower price |
| Median Rent | $2K | $2K ✓ Lower rent |
| Median Income | $108K ✓ Higher income | $88K |
| Price Volatility | Moderate | Moderate |
| Getting Around | ||
| Walk Score | 36/100 ✓ More walkable | 13/100 |
| Transit Score | 28/100 ✓ Better transit | 22/100 |
| Bike Score | 18/100 | 62/100 ✓ More bikeable |
| Commute | 12 min ✓ Shorter commute | 78 min |
| Safety & Environment | ||
| Safety Grade | B ✓ Safer | D+ |
| Violent Crime | Low ✓ Lower risk | Moderate |
| Property Crime | Moderate | Moderate |
| Flood Risk | Low | Low |
| Air Quality | Moderate | Moderate |
| Community | ||
| Schools | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Best for | familiescommutershigh_income earners | Families with childrenStudents in highly rated schoolsRemote workers who need a car |
Bottom line
For families with children who prioritize top schools and a quieter lifestyle, Burbank is the better choice. However, for those who value a bike-friendly commute and a smaller mortgage with strong schools, Santa Rosa might be a more affordable option despite its longer overall commute. Overall, Burbank offers a convenient location at a high cost, while Santa Rosa provides a suburban atmosphere with its own trade-offs.
Share this comparison