Let the numbers do the talking.
Los Angeles, CA vs San Jose, CA
| Category | Los Angeles, CA | San Jose, CA |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | ||
| Verdict | Good for now | Think twice |
| Median Price | $1.14M | $892K ✓ Lower price |
| Median Rent | $2K ✓ Lower rent | $3K |
| Median Income | $108K | $129K ✓ Higher income |
| Price Volatility | Moderate ✓ More stable | High |
| Getting Around | ||
| Walk Score | 36/100 | 57/100 ✓ More walkable |
| Transit Score | 28/100 ✓ Better transit | 10/100 |
| Bike Score | 18/100 | 60/100 ✓ More bikeable |
| Commute | 12 min ✓ Shorter commute | 60 min |
| Safety & Environment | ||
| Safety Grade | B ✓ Safer | D+ |
| Violent Crime | Low ✓ Lower risk | Moderate |
| Property Crime | Moderate | Moderate |
| Flood Risk | Low | Low |
| Air Quality | Moderate | Moderate |
| Community | ||
| Schools | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Best for | familiescommutershigh_income earners | Tech professionalsFamilies seeking quality schoolsRemote workers with high incomes |
Bottom line
If you're a high-income earner seeking quality schools and easy access to downtown Los Angeles, Burbank may suit your needs, but be prepared for sky-high prices and car-dependency. If instead you prioritize affordability and good schools, but can tolerate a long commute and limited public transit, San Jose might be suitable. For most people, however, the more practical pick would be Burbank.
Share this comparison