Let the numbers do the talking.
Folsom, CA vs Sherman Oaks, CA
Folsom, CA vs Sherman Oaks, CA: What the data shows
Folsom, CA is in Folsom, CA while Sherman Oaks, CA is in Sherman Oaks, CA — both in the same state. On home prices, Folsom, CA is the more affordable option at $673,000 median — $643,400 less than Sherman Oaks, CA's $1,316,400. WYLT rates Folsom, CA as “Good for now” — a solid choice worth serious consideration — and Sherman Oaks, CA as “Good for now” — a solid choice worth serious consideration.
Folsom, CA has the stronger safety profile of the two. Folsom, CA has Low violent crime and Moderate property crime. Sherman Oaks, CA has Moderate violent crime and Moderate property crime. On environmental risk, Folsom, CA has Low flood risk and Sherman Oaks, CA has Low flood risk.
Sherman Oaks, CA is the more walkable neighborhood. Folsom, CA scores 31/100 (mostly car-dependent) versus Sherman Oaks, CA's 35/100 (mostly car-dependent). For families weighing school quality, both neighborhoods have the same school rating — Folsom, CA rates 5/10 and Sherman Oaks, CA rates 5/10.
| Category | Folsom, CA | Sherman Oaks, CA |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | ||
| Verdict | Good for now | Good for now |
| Median Price | $673K ✓ Lower price | $1.32M |
| Median Rent | $2K ✓ Lower rent | $2K |
| Median Income | $135K ✓ Higher income | $108K |
| Price Volatility | Moderate | Moderate |
| Getting Around | ||
| Walk Score | 31/100 | 35/100 ✓ More walkable |
| Transit Score | 10/100 | 32/100 ✓ Better transit |
| Bike Score | 31/100 ✓ More bikeable | N/A |
| Commute | 31 min | 24 min ✓ Shorter commute |
| Safety & Environment | ||
| Safety Grade | B ✓ Safer | D+ |
| Violent Crime | Low ✓ Lower risk | Moderate |
| Property Crime | Moderate | Moderate |
| Flood Risk | Low | Low |
| Air Quality | Good ✓ Cleaner air | Moderate |
| Community | ||
| Schools | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Best for | Families with young childrenParents looking for good schoolsCommuters to Sacramento | Families with kidsProfessionals commuting to downtown LAAffluent individuals looking for a suburban feel |
Bottom line
Folsom is a better choice for families with young children on a moderate budget, as it offers great schools at a relatively lower cost compared to Sherman Oaks. If affordability isn't your top priority, Sherman Oaks is a better fit for affluent professionals or families who prioritize convenience to downtown LA and don't mind the high cost of living. Ultimately, both neighborhoods are solid options, but it depends on your specific needs and priorities.
Share this comparison