Let the numbers do the talking.
Beavercreek, OH vs Cincinnati, OH
Beavercreek, OH vs Cincinnati, OH: What the data shows
Beavercreek, OH is in Beavercreek, OH while Cincinnati, OH is in Cincinnati, OH — both in the same state. On home prices, Beavercreek, OH is the more affordable option at $288,900 median — $99,000 less than Cincinnati, OH's $387,900. WYLT rates Beavercreek, OH as “Good for now” — a solid choice worth serious consideration — and Cincinnati, OH as “Think twice” — a neighborhood that warrants careful research before committing.
Beavercreek, OH has the stronger safety profile of the two. Beavercreek, OH has Low violent crime and Low property crime. Cincinnati, OH has Moderate violent crime and Moderate property crime. On environmental risk, Beavercreek, OH has Low flood risk and Cincinnati, OH has Low flood risk.
Cincinnati, OH is the more walkable neighborhood. Beavercreek, OH scores 13/100 (car-dependent) versus Cincinnati, OH's 15/100 (car-dependent). For families weighing school quality, Beavercreek, OH has the higher school rating — Beavercreek, OH rates 6.8/10 and Cincinnati, OH rates 6/10.
| Category | Beavercreek, OH | Cincinnati, OH |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | ||
| Verdict | Good for now | Think twice |
| Median Price | $289K ✓ Lower price | $388K |
| Median Rent | $1K ✓ Lower rent | $1K |
| Median Income | $140K ✓ Higher income | $102K |
| Price Volatility | Low ✓ More stable | Moderate |
| Getting Around | ||
| Walk Score | 13/100 | 15/100 ✓ More walkable |
| Transit Score | Minimal transit | Minimal transit |
| Bike Score | N/A | N/A |
| Commute | 45 min | 12 min ✓ Shorter commute |
| Safety & Environment | ||
| Safety Grade | A ✓ Safer | D+ |
| Violent Crime | Low ✓ Lower risk | Moderate |
| Property Crime | Low ✓ Lower risk | Moderate |
| Flood Risk | Low | Low |
| Air Quality | Good | Good |
| Community | ||
| Schools | 6.8/10 ✓ Better schools | 6/10 |
| Best for | FamiliesSuburban commutersStudents with local schools | FamiliesCommuters to downtownRemote workers with higher income |
Bottom line
Share this comparison