Let the numbers do the talking.
Washington, DC 20003 vs Washington, DC 20009
| Category | Washington, DC 20003 | Washington, DC 20009 |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | ||
| Verdict | Good for now | Think twice |
| Median Price | $926K | $723K ✓ Lower price |
| Median Rent | $3K | $2K ✓ Lower rent |
| Median Income | $155K ✓ Higher income | $132K |
| Price Volatility | Moderate | Moderate |
| Getting Around | ||
| Walk Score | 88/100 | 95/100 ✓ More walkable |
| Transit Score | 55/100 | 55/100 |
| Bike Score | 80/100 | 80/100 |
| Commute | 7 min | 7 min ✓ Shorter commute |
| Safety & Environment | ||
| Safety Grade | D+ | D+ |
| Violent Crime | Moderate | Moderate |
| Property Crime | Moderate | Moderate |
| Flood Risk | Low | Low |
| Air Quality | Moderate | Moderate |
| Community | ||
| Schools | 7.4/10 | 7.4/10 |
| Best for | urban professionalsstudentshigh‑income earners | Young professionalsRemote workersStudents |
Bottom line
If you're a young professional or student who values walkability and proximity to urban amenities, the second neighborhood is a better choice due to its higher walk score and slightly lower median home price. However, families and retirees may want to consider other options due to the noise and hectic atmosphere of both neighborhoods. The first neighborhood is not significantly better than the second, making the second a more affordable option with similar benefits.
Share this comparison