Let the numbers do the talking.
Seattle, WA vs Vancouver, WA
| Category | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | ||
| Verdict | Good for now | Think twice |
| Median Price | $950K | $413K ✓ Lower price |
| Median Rent | $3K | $1K ✓ Lower rent |
| Median Income | $90K ✓ Higher income | $62K |
| Price Volatility | Moderate | Moderate |
| Getting Around | ||
| Walk Score | 40/100 ✓ More walkable | 31/100 |
| Transit Score | 37/100 ✓ Better transit | 17/100 |
| Bike Score | 62/100 ✓ More bikeable | 57/100 |
| Commute | 13 min ✓ Shorter commute | 45 min |
| Safety & Environment | ||
| Safety Grade | D+ | D+ |
| Violent Crime | Moderate | Moderate |
| Property Crime | Moderate | Moderate |
| Flood Risk | Low | Low |
| Air Quality | Moderate | Moderate |
| Community | ||
| Schools | 8/10 ✓ Better schools | 6.9/10 |
| Best for | FamiliesRetireesRemote workers | Families seeking good schools on a budgetPeople willing to commute to Seattle by carOutdoor lovers who enjoy riverfront and park access |
Bottom line
If you're a family seeking good schools on a budget and are willing to commute to Seattle, Vancouver might be a better fit. However, Vancouver's car dependency, moderate crime, and 45-minute commute to Seattle make it a less desirable choice than Seattle's 98115 for remote workers, retirees, or those prioritizing walkability. Overall, Seattle's 98115 is the more attractive option for those who value convenience, walkability, and proximity to amenities.
Share this comparison