Let the numbers do the talking.
Saco, ME vs Waterville, ME
| Category | Saco, ME | Waterville, ME |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | ||
| Verdict | Think twice | Good for now |
| Median Price | $345K | $168K ✓ Lower price |
| Median Rent | $1K | $881 ✓ Lower rent |
| Median Income | $81K ✓ Higher income | $51K |
| Price Volatility | Low ✓ More stable | Moderate |
| Getting Around | ||
| Walk Score | Car-dependent | 13/100 ✓ More walkable |
| Transit Score | Minimal transit | 1/100 ✓ Better transit |
| Bike Score | N/A | 1/100 ✓ More bikeable |
| Commute | 45 min | 30 min ✓ Shorter commute |
| Safety & Environment | ||
| Safety Grade | B ✓ Safer | D+ |
| Violent Crime | Low ✓ Lower risk | Moderate |
| Property Crime | Moderate | Moderate |
| Flood Risk | Low | Low |
| Air Quality | Good | Good |
| Community | ||
| Schools | 5.4/10 | 6/10 ✓ Better schools |
| Best for | Families looking for suburban feelFirst‑time homebuyers with moderate budgetsRemote workers who value quiet | family-friendlyaffordablesmall-town lifestyle |
Bottom line
For a family looking for a suburban feel and a quiet atmosphere, Saco might be the better choice since its schools are actually slightly better and commute time is relatively similar. However, if you prioritize affordability, need to balance a budget, or value a tight-knit community, Waterville offers a lower price point and a shorter commute to Portland. Ultimately, think twice about Saco due to its lack of walkability and amenities, whereas Waterville represents standard suburban trade-offs that might not be as extreme.
Share this comparison