Let the numbers do the talking.
Plymouth, MN vs Saint Paul, MN
| Category | Plymouth, MN | Saint Paul, MN |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | ||
| Verdict | Good for now | Good for now |
| Median Price | $429K | $277K ✓ Lower price |
| Median Rent | $1K | $1K ✓ Lower rent |
| Median Income | $99K ✓ Higher income | $70K |
| Price Volatility | Moderate | Moderate |
| Getting Around | ||
| Walk Score | Car-dependent | 40/100 ✓ More walkable |
| Transit Score | Minimal transit | 50/100 ✓ Better transit |
| Bike Score | N/A | 54/100 ✓ More bikeable |
| Commute | 19 min | 13 min ✓ Shorter commute |
| Safety & Environment | ||
| Safety Grade | D+ | D+ |
| Violent Crime | Moderate | Moderate |
| Property Crime | Moderate | Moderate |
| Flood Risk | High | Low ✓ Lower risk |
| Air Quality | Good ✓ Cleaner air | Moderate |
| Community | ||
| Schools | 5/10 | 6.1/10 ✓ Better schools |
| Best for | Families with school-aged childrenCommuters to MinneapolisHigh‑income earners seeking quiet suburbs | young professionalscommuterspublic transit users |
Bottom line
If you're a family with school-aged children who value a calm environment and a shorter drive to Minneapolis, Plymouth is a more suitable option, despite its pricey real estate and high flood risk. For young professionals, pet owners, and public transit users, Saint Paul 55104's affordability, decent commute, and some amenities may outweigh its lower walkability and moderate crime. Overall, Plymouth is the better choice for families, while Saint Paul suits more independent individuals or couples without children.
Share this comparison