Let the numbers do the talking.
Pasadena, CA vs San Francisco, CA
Pasadena, CA vs San Francisco, CA: What the data shows
Pasadena, CA is in Pasadena, CA while San Francisco, CA is in San Francisco, CA — both in the same state. On home prices, Pasadena, CA is the more affordable option at $1,053,000 median — $12,100 less than San Francisco, CA's $1,065,100. WYLT rates Pasadena, CA as “Settle here” — an excellent place to put down roots — and San Francisco, CA as “Settle here” — an excellent place to put down roots.
Pasadena, CA has the stronger safety profile of the two. Pasadena, CA has Low violent crime and Low property crime. San Francisco, CA has Moderate violent crime and Moderate property crime. On environmental risk, Pasadena, CA has Low flood risk and San Francisco, CA has Low flood risk.
San Francisco, CA is the more walkable neighborhood. Pasadena, CA scores 10/100 (car-dependent) versus San Francisco, CA's 90/100 (exceptionally walkable). For families weighing school quality, both neighborhoods have the same school rating — Pasadena, CA rates 5/10 and San Francisco, CA rates 5/10.
| Category | Pasadena, CA | San Francisco, CA |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | ||
| Verdict | Settle here | Settle here |
| Median Price | $1.05M ✓ Lower price | $1.07M |
| Median Rent | $4K | $2K ✓ Lower rent |
| Median Income | $123K ✓ Higher income | $111K |
| Price Volatility | Moderate ✓ More stable | High |
| Getting Around | ||
| Walk Score | 10/100 | 90/100 ✓ More walkable |
| Transit Score | Minimal transit | 73/100 ✓ Better transit |
| Bike Score | N/A | 80/100 ✓ More bikeable |
| Commute | 15 min | 2 min ✓ Shorter commute |
| Safety & Environment | ||
| Safety Grade | A ✓ Safer | D+ |
| Violent Crime | Low ✓ Lower risk | Moderate |
| Property Crime | Low ✓ Lower risk | Moderate |
| Flood Risk | Low | Low |
| Air Quality | Good | Good |
| Community | ||
| Schools | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Best for | FamiliesProfessionalsYoung adults | Tech professionals who need proximity to downtownRemote workers who value walkability and public transitYoung singles and couples looking for a vibrant city lifestyle |
Bottom line
Both Pasadena and San Francisco offer desirable, high-end lifestyles for specific groups, but they have distinct differences in affordability, commute, and walkability. Families and professionals on a tighter budget may prefer Pasadena due to its relatively lower median home price and still-commutable distance to Downtown Los Angeles. However, young, high-income individuals, remote workers, and those prioritizing walkability and transit may prefer San Francisco's unbeatable downtown access and vibrant urban lifestyle.
Share this comparison