Let the numbers do the talking.
Pasadena, CA vs San Francisco, CA
Pasadena, CA vs San Francisco, CA: What the data shows
Pasadena, CA is in Pasadena, CA while San Francisco, CA is in San Francisco, CA — both in the same state. On home prices, San Francisco, CA is the more affordable option at $1,039,000 median — $14,000 less than Pasadena, CA's $1,053,000. WYLT rates Pasadena, CA as “Settle here” — an excellent place to put down roots — and San Francisco, CA as “Think twice” — a neighborhood that warrants careful research before committing.
Pasadena, CA has the stronger safety profile of the two. Pasadena, CA has Low violent crime and Low property crime. San Francisco, CA has Moderate violent crime and High property crime. On environmental risk, Pasadena, CA has Low flood risk and San Francisco, CA has Low flood risk.
San Francisco, CA is the more walkable neighborhood. Pasadena, CA scores 10/100 (car-dependent) versus San Francisco, CA's 97/100 (exceptionally walkable). For families weighing school quality, both neighborhoods have the same school rating — Pasadena, CA rates 5/10 and San Francisco, CA rates 5/10.
| Category | Pasadena, CA | San Francisco, CA |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | ||
| Verdict | Settle here | Think twice |
| Median Price | $1.05M | $1.04M ✓ Lower price |
| Median Rent | $4K | $2K ✓ Lower rent |
| Median Income | $123K ✓ Higher income | $62K |
| Price Volatility | Moderate | Moderate |
| Getting Around | ||
| Walk Score | 10/100 | 97/100 ✓ More walkable |
| Transit Score | Minimal transit | 100/100 ✓ Better transit |
| Bike Score | N/A | 76/100 ✓ More bikeable |
| Commute | 15 min | 4 min ✓ Shorter commute |
| Safety & Environment | ||
| Safety Grade | A ✓ Safer | F |
| Violent Crime | Low ✓ Lower risk | Moderate |
| Property Crime | Low ✓ Lower risk | High |
| Flood Risk | Low | Low |
| Air Quality | Good | Good |
| Community | ||
| Schools | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Best for | FamiliesProfessionalsYoung adults | Young professionalsRemote workersFoodies |
Bottom line
If you're a family or on a fixed budget, Pasadena is likely a better choice due to its more affordable housing options compared to San Francisco. However, if you're a young professional or remote worker valuing convenience and walkability above all else, San Francisco might be worth considering despite its high costs. Ultimately, the decision comes down to your personal priorities and financial situation.
Share this comparison