Let the numbers do the talking.
O'Fallon, MO vs Raytown, MO
| Category | O'Fallon, MO | Raytown, MO |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | ||
| Verdict | Think twice | Good for now |
| Median Price | $263K | $159K ✓ Lower price |
| Median Rent | $1K | $1K ✓ Lower rent |
| Median Income | $92K ✓ Higher income | $64K |
| Price Volatility | Moderate | Low ✓ More stable |
| Getting Around | ||
| Walk Score | Car-dependent | Car-dependent |
| Transit Score | Minimal transit | Minimal transit |
| Bike Score | N/A | N/A |
| Commute | 56 min | 13 min ✓ Shorter commute |
| Safety & Environment | ||
| Safety Grade | D+ | D+ |
| Violent Crime | Moderate | Moderate |
| Property Crime | Moderate | Moderate |
| Flood Risk | Low | Low |
| Air Quality | Moderate | Moderate |
| Community | ||
| Schools | N/A | N/A |
| Best for | Middle‑income familiesSuburban commutersThose who prefer a quiet lifestyle | Commuters to Kansas CityBudget‑conscious home buyersFamilies seeking single‑family homes in a quiet area |
Bottom line
For commuters to Kansas City, Raytown is a slightly better option due to its faster commute time and lower median home price. However, if you're willing to tolerate longer commutes and drive more frequently, O'Fallon might be a quieter alternative with still somewhat affordable housing prices. Overall, Raytown edges out O'Fallon for suburban commuters who want easier access to the city.
Share this comparison