Let the numbers do the talking.
Newton, MA vs Worcester, MA
| Category | Newton, MA | Worcester, MA |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | ||
| Verdict | Settle here | Think twice |
| Median Price | $972K | N/A |
| Median Rent | $2K | N/A |
| Median Income | $134K | N/A |
| Price Volatility | Low ✓ More stable | Moderate |
| Getting Around | ||
| Walk Score | 32/100 ✓ More walkable | Car-dependent |
| Transit Score | 44/100 ✓ Better transit | Minimal transit |
| Bike Score | 36/100 ✓ More bikeable | N/A |
| Commute | 15 min ✓ Shorter commute | 69 min |
| Safety & Environment | ||
| Safety Grade | A ✓ Safer | D+ |
| Violent Crime | Low ✓ Lower risk | Moderate |
| Property Crime | Low ✓ Lower risk | Moderate |
| Flood Risk | Low | Low |
| Air Quality | Good ✓ Cleaner air | Moderate |
| Community | ||
| Schools | 7.6/10 ✓ Better schools | 7.3/10 |
| Best for | FamiliesCommuters to BostonHigh income professionals | First‑time home buyers seeking affordabilityFamilies valuing strong schoolsUrban culture enthusiasts |
Bottom line
Newton is the better choice for those prioritizing a short commute to Boston, top-rated schools, and a safe suburban environment, but it comes with a steep cost of living. Worcester may be a more affordable option for first-time home buyers or those willing to drive and commute, but its limited walkability and long commute to Boston are significant drawbacks. Ultimately, Newton is the better fit for high-income professionals and families seeking a convenient and high-quality lifestyle.
Share this comparison