Let the numbers do the talking.
Minneapolis, MN vs St. Paul, MN
| Category | Minneapolis, MN | St. Paul, MN |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | ||
| Verdict | Good for now | Think twice |
| Median Price | $339K | $245K ✓ Lower price |
| Median Rent | $1K ✓ Lower rent | $2K |
| Median Income | $78K ✓ Higher income | $76K |
| Price Volatility | Moderate | Moderate |
| Getting Around | ||
| Walk Score | 26/100 | 65/100 ✓ More walkable |
| Transit Score | 41/100 | 82/100 ✓ Better transit |
| Bike Score | 54/100 ✓ More bikeable | 44/100 |
| Commute | 6 min ✓ Shorter commute | 18 min |
| Safety & Environment | ||
| Safety Grade | D+ | D+ |
| Violent Crime | Moderate | Moderate |
| Property Crime | Moderate | Moderate |
| Flood Risk | Low | Low |
| Air Quality | Good ✓ Cleaner air | Moderate |
| Community | ||
| Schools | 5.7/10 | 6/10 ✓ Better schools |
| Best for | young professionalsstudentscommuters | Young professionalsCommutersNightlife lovers |
Bottom line
The Minneapolis neighborhood is a better fit for those who prioritize convenience to downtown and a more subdued urban experience, despite higher costs. In contrast, the St. Paul neighborhood is more suitable for young professionals and commuters who value a vibrant city life and can tolerate some noise and safety concerns. Overall, Minneapolis is the better choice for those seeking a more balanced urban experience, while St. Paul is ideal for those who prioritize affordability and a lively atmosphere.
Share this comparison