Let the numbers do the talking.
Los Angeles, CA vs San Mateo, CA
| Category | Los Angeles, CA | San Mateo, CA |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | ||
| Verdict | Good for now | Good for now |
| Median Price | $1.14M | $1.09M ✓ Lower price |
| Median Rent | $2K ✓ Lower rent | $3K |
| Median Income | $108K | $118K ✓ Higher income |
| Price Volatility | Moderate | Moderate |
| Getting Around | ||
| Walk Score | 36/100 | 53/100 ✓ More walkable |
| Transit Score | 28/100 ✓ Better transit | 22/100 |
| Bike Score | 18/100 | 54/100 ✓ More bikeable |
| Commute | 12 min ✓ Shorter commute | 26 min |
| Safety & Environment | ||
| Safety Grade | B | B |
| Violent Crime | Low | Low |
| Property Crime | Moderate | Moderate |
| Flood Risk | Low | Low |
| Air Quality | Moderate | Moderate |
| Community | ||
| Schools | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Best for | familiescommutershigh_income earners | Families with school prioritiesFirst‑time home buyers looking for a good commuteAsian community members |
Bottom line
For high-end families and commuters willing to sacrifice some walkability and affordability, Burbank's proximity to downtown LA is a stronger draw than San Mateo's access to San Francisco. Conversely, for those prioritizing a suburban feel, good schools, and a solid public-school system, San Mateo is the more practical choice. Ultimately, Burbank is better for those who value convenience over affordability, while San Mateo is ideal for family-focused residents.
Share this comparison