Let the numbers do the talking.
Livingston, MT vs Missoula, MT
Livingston, MT vs Missoula, MT: What the data shows
Livingston, MT is in Livingston, MT while Missoula, MT is in Missoula, MT — both in the same state. On home prices, Missoula, MT is the more affordable option at $354,900 median — $41,100 less than Livingston, MT's $396,000. WYLT rates Livingston, MT as “Think twice” — a neighborhood that warrants careful research before committing — and Missoula, MT as “Think twice” — a neighborhood that warrants careful research before committing.
Livingston, MT has the stronger safety profile of the two. Livingston, MT has Low violent crime and Low property crime. Missoula, MT has Low violent crime and Moderate property crime. On environmental risk, Livingston, MT has Low flood risk and Missoula, MT has Low flood risk.
Livingston, MT is the more walkable neighborhood. Livingston, MT scores 46/100 (mostly car-dependent) versus Missoula, MT's 22/100 (car-dependent). For families weighing school quality, Missoula, MT has the higher school rating — Livingston, MT rates 7/10 and Missoula, MT rates 7.3/10.
| Category | Livingston, MT | Missoula, MT |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | ||
| Verdict | Think twice | Think twice |
| Median Price | $396K | $355K ✓ Lower price |
| Median Rent | $941 ✓ Lower rent | $1K |
| Median Income | $69K ✓ Higher income | $51K |
| Price Volatility | Low ✓ More stable | Moderate |
| Getting Around | ||
| Walk Score | 46/100 ✓ More walkable | 22/100 |
| Transit Score | Minimal transit | 40/100 ✓ Better transit |
| Bike Score | N/A | 25/100 ✓ More bikeable |
| Commute | N/A | 30 min |
| Safety & Environment | ||
| Safety Grade | A ✓ Safer | B |
| Violent Crime | Low | Low |
| Property Crime | Low ✓ Lower risk | Moderate |
| Flood Risk | Low | Low |
| Air Quality | Good | Good |
| Community | ||
| Schools | 7/10 | 7.3/10 ✓ Better schools |
| Best for | Remote workersFamilies seeking quietOutdoor enthusiasts | Outdoor enthusiastsFamilies with school‑age childrenRemote workers needing a calm environment |
Bottom line
Both Livingston and Missoula offer decent but imperfect options for those seeking rural or outdoor lifestyles, but they cater to different preferences. If you prioritize affordability and a more isolated environment, Livingston might be a better fit. However, if you're willing to accept a higher cost of living in exchange for access to more town amenities and a slightly shorter commute, Missoula is a more suitable choice.
Share this comparison