Let the numbers do the talking.
Haverhill, MA vs Worcester, MA
| Category | Haverhill, MA | Worcester, MA |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | ||
| Verdict | Think twice | Think twice |
| Median Price | $400K | N/A |
| Median Rent | $1K | N/A |
| Median Income | $72K | N/A |
| Price Volatility | Moderate | Moderate |
| Getting Around | ||
| Walk Score | 11/100 ✓ More walkable | Car-dependent |
| Transit Score | Minimal transit | Minimal transit ✓ Better transit |
| Bike Score | 18/100 ✓ More bikeable | N/A |
| Commute | 49 min ✓ Shorter commute | 69 min |
| Safety & Environment | ||
| Safety Grade | D+ | D+ |
| Violent Crime | Moderate | Moderate |
| Property Crime | Moderate | Moderate |
| Flood Risk | Low | Low |
| Air Quality | Moderate | Moderate |
| Community | ||
| Schools | 7.1/10 | 7.3/10 ✓ Better schools |
| Best for | Families with childrenCommuters to BostonStudents and young professionals who prefer a quieter town | First‑time home buyers seeking affordabilityFamilies valuing strong schoolsUrban culture enthusiasts |
Bottom line
For those prioritizing a slightly more convenient commute to Boston, Haverhill is the better choice, despite its limitations. Worcester may be a better fit for first-time home buyers or those prioritizing strong schools and a more urban culture, as long as they are willing to accept a longer commute. Overall, Haverhill's slightly higher walk score and shorter commute give it a narrow edge over Worcester for most people.
Share this comparison